Why Green Finance Matters Now?
The clock on climate change is ticking faster than financial markets once imagined. In just the past five years, the frequency of billion-dollar climate disasters has nearly doubled, according to the World Meteorological Organization. Floods in Europe, wildfires in Canada, and record-breaking heatwaves in Asia have revealed a stark truth: climate risk is now financial risk. For investors, governments, and corporations, the old idea that sustainability is optional has crumbled. The world’s economic stability now depends on its ability to mobilize green finance capital directed toward climate-positive transformation.
The numbers themselves tell a compelling story. Global green bond issuance surged past $5 trillion by late 2024, driven by investors seeking both profit and purpose, as reported by the Climate Bonds Initiative. Meanwhile, climate funds once viewed as niche ESG vehicles are rapidly becoming mainstream, offering diversified portfolios that fund renewable energy, circular economy startups, and resilient infrastructure. Major institutions such as the World Bank, the European Investment Bank, and private players like BlackRock’s Climate Transition Fund are channeling billions into sustainable projects, signaling that environmental finance is no longer an alternative asset, it’s the new default.
This transformation mirrors the early internet boom of the 1990s. Just as digital technologies rewired global communication, green finance is rewiring the flow of capital from fossil-intensive sectors toward innovation and regeneration. But unlike the tech revolution, this one carries existential urgency: it isn’t just about efficiency or market share; it’s about survival.
Beyond the boardrooms and trading floors, grassroots models like Earth5R’s community capital program are ensuring that these financial shifts don’t remain abstract. They translate sustainable funding into tangible local projects from waste management initiatives to clean water programs demonstrating how green finance can scale from a community garden to a global movement.
In this context, green finance matters now because it defines the economic architecture of a livable future. It’s not merely an investment choice it’s humanity’s collective balance sheet against time.
Definitions & Taxonomy: Sustainable Bonds, GSS+, and Climate Funds
Before diving deeper into trends and market movements, it’s essential to understand the vocabulary shaping the world of green finance. These aren’t buzzwords, they’re the frameworks that determine how money moves toward sustainability. The most prominent instruments in this space are grouped under what experts call GSS+ bonds short for Green, Social, Sustainability, and Sustainability-Linked bonds. Together, they represent a new taxonomy of financial tools designed to link investment returns with real-world impact.
At the core lies the Green Bond, a debt instrument where proceeds are exclusively used for projects that deliver measurable environmental benefits such as renewable energy installations, green transport networks, or climate-resilient agriculture. Since the first green bond issued by the World Bank in 2008, these instruments have become a global benchmark for climate-conscious investment. Closely following are Social Bonds, which channel funds into projects addressing inequality like affordable housing, access to healthcare, and education while Sustainability Bonds combine both environmental and social outcomes, offering investors a broader impact portfolio.
The “plus” in GSS+ marks the arrival of Sustainability-Linked Bonds (SLBs) a newer, performance-based innovation. Unlike traditional green bonds, SLBs don’t limit where the money goes; instead, they tie a company’s borrowing cost to its ability to meet sustainability targets such as reducing carbon emissions or increasing renewable energy use. Think of it as a fitness tracker for corporate responsibility the better you perform, the more you save.
Then come Climate Funds, large-scale investment vehicles often backed by institutions like the Green Climate Fund, UNEP Finance Initiative, or private equity players that pool capital to finance long-term mitigation and adaptation projects. These funds are the engines behind clean energy startups, sustainable agriculture ventures, and low-carbon city development, ensuring that climate ambition is translated into measurable action.
Market Performance & Macro Trends (Data-Driven)
In the past decade, the green bond and sustainable finance market has grown from a niche experiment to a central artery of global capital flows. In 2024 alone, aligned GSS+ (Green, Social, Sustainability, and Sustainability-Linked) debt issuance reached USD 1.1 trillion, propelling the cumulative aligned market past USD 5.7 trillion by year’s end. Green bonds remained the dominant segment in 2024, with USD 669–670 billion in aligned issuance, representing more than half of the total.
But 2025 has ushered in turbulence. In the first quarter, labelled sustainable bond issuance contracted by about 18.6 % year-over-year, and green, social, sustainability, and transition bonds all saw double-digit drops in volume compared to Q1 2024. By Q2, the slump deepened: total sustainable issuance fell 19.9 %, with green bonds down 14.6 %, social bonds falling 27 %, and transition bonds collapsing 78.8 %. Some observers link the downturn to policy rollbacks in major jurisdictions—especially the U.S. and parts of Europe—creating investor hesitation and increasing perceived regulatory risk.
Regionally, issuance patterns have shifted. China, for instance, recorded USD 68.9 billion in aligned green debt in 2024, pushing its cumulative sustainable bond tally to USD 555.5 billion and placing it among the top global markets. India also demonstrated strong momentum: by end-2024, it had issued USD 55.9 billion in GSS+ debt, marking a 186 % growth since 2021, with green debt forming 83 % of that total. On the other hand, U.S. issuance has cooled sharply. In early 2025, U.S. financial institutions accounted for only 0.1 % of global green bond volume, and issuance fell dramatically amid a wave of “greenhushing” where issuers shy away from labeling debt as “green” for political or reputational reasons. Still, the downtrend isn’t uniform. Some analysts point out signs of resilience and structural recalibration. VanEck, in its commentary, notes that as of July 2025, only USD 60.6 billion in USD-denominated green bonds had been issued versus USD 99 billion in the same span of 2024 highlighting a sharp retrenchment in dollar markets. Yet despite these contractions, cumulative volumes continue to rise, with the global sustainable debt market breaking through the USD 6 trillion mark in 2025.
Viewed through a macro lens, these fluctuations mirror broader capital cycle dynamics and policy pivots. Much like how tech equities surged and then slumped with shifting interest rates and sentiment, sustainable finance is reacting to monetary tightening, geopolitical uncertainty, and shifting regulatory confidence. Moreover, the concentration of issuers particularly sovereigns, development banks, and corporates in Europe and Asia suggests that issuer diversity and geographical balance will be pivotal to long-term market robustness.
In short, 2024 was a record year for alignment and scale; 2025 is testing market resolve. The question now is whether this cycle is a temporary pullback or the start of a deeper reconfiguration in how capital chases sustainability.
Drivers: Regulation, Investor Demand, Risk Pricing & Technology
The surge in green finance isn’t happening by accident it’s the product of deliberate policy design, shifting investor psychology, and breakthroughs in financial technology. At its core, the momentum is powered by three converging forces: regulation, demand, and data. Together, they are turning sustainability from an ethical aspiration into a financial imperative.
Regulation has emerged as the backbone of this transformation. Across continents, governments and central banks are crafting taxonomies and disclosure frameworks that define what counts as “green.” The European Union’s Sustainable Finance Taxonomy, for example, has become the gold standard, mandating corporate disclosure on environmental performance. Similarly, India’s Green Finance Guidelines (RBI, 2024) and China’s Green Bond Endorsed Project Catalogue are tightening definitions, reducing greenwashing, and creating investor confidence. These frameworks function much like traffic signals for capital they don’t drive the cars, but they determine who moves when and where, ensuring money flows safely toward genuinely sustainable projects.
Meanwhile, investor demand is rewriting portfolio logic. Pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and retail investors increasingly view climate risk as investment risk, prompting them to seek low-carbon assets with long-term stability. BlackRock, for instance, integrated climate metrics into all actively managed portfolios, while Norway’s sovereign fund divested from fossil-heavy companies. This shift isn’t ideological it’s actuarial. With extreme weather events threatening trillions in infrastructure and insurance losses, investing green has become a strategy for preserving capital.
The third driver is technology, especially in data analytics and risk modeling. AI-driven platforms like Moody’s ESG Solutions and MSCI Climate Lab are quantifying non-financial risks measuring carbon intensity, water usage, and biodiversity footprints. Blockchain applications are emerging to track use-of-proceeds for green bonds, providing real-time transparency and reducing fraud risk.
In this interplay of policy, markets, and tech, we’re witnessing the birth of a new financial ecosystem one where regulations provide the guardrails, investors supply the fuel, and technology powers the engine of green capital. The result isn’t just a trend it’s the structural rewiring of finance itself, aligning profits with planetary stability.
Product Innovation: Sustainability-Linked Bonds, Transition Bonds & Blended Finance
The green finance landscape is no longer confined to traditional use-of-proceeds instruments like green bonds. As markets mature, financial innovation is expanding the boundaries of sustainability-linked capital, introducing products that merge environmental accountability with financial performance. Three instruments in particular Sustainability-Linked Bonds (SLBs), Transition Bonds, and Blended Finance are redefining how capital is structured for the climate era.
Sustainability-Linked Bonds represent a major shift from static funding models. Unlike traditional green bonds that earmark funds for specific projects, SLBs tie a borrower’s cost of capital directly to achieving predefined sustainability targets such as cutting carbon emissions, improving energy efficiency, or increasing renewable energy use. When these targets are missed, coupon rates rise, effectively penalizing poor sustainability performance. This design has gained traction among corporate issuers like Enel (Italy) and Novartis, which have embedded measurable climate targets into their bond covenants. In effect, SLBs transform sustainability commitments from marketing slogans into legally binding performance indicators.
Transition Bonds, on the other hand, fill a critical gap for carbon-intensive sectors like steel, aviation, and cement that can’t turn green overnight but are moving toward lower emissions. Japan has become a pioneer in this space, issuing transition bonds aligned with its 2050 net-zero roadmap. These instruments recognize that decarbonization is a journey, not a jump, offering financial pathways for “brown-to-green” evolution without excluding legacy industries from climate finance.
The third frontier is Blended Finance, a model that combines concessional public capital (from development banks or philanthropies) with private investment to de-risk green projects in emerging markets. The IFC and Green Climate Fund have used this approach to mobilize billions for renewable energy and adaptation initiatives across Africa and South Asia. It’s a financial bridge that connects risk-averse investors with high-impact opportunities a marriage of prudence and purpose.
Together, these innovations are expanding the toolkit of green finance, ensuring that capital markets evolve as fast as the climate challenge demands.
Investor Perspectives & Performance Evidence
For investors, green finance has shifted from a moral statement to a market strategy. The early perception that sustainable investing sacrifices returns is rapidly fading, replaced by mounting empirical evidence that green assets can deliver competitive and sometimes superior risk-adjusted performance. As environmental shocks reshape economies, the smartest money is no longer chasing short-term profits but long-term resilience.
Data from the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and Morningstar’s Global Sustainable Fund Review reveal that sustainable funds outperformed conventional peers in both the 2020 and 2023 market shocks, largely due to their lower exposure to volatile fossil sectors and stronger governance frameworks. Similarly, the Climate Bonds Initiative reports that green bonds exhibit “greenium”;a small yield advantage of roughly 2 to 5 basis points indicating investors are willing to accept slightly lower yields in exchange for reduced climate and reputational risk. In other words, sustainability is commanding a premium.
Institutional investors are leading this charge. Pension funds in Scandinavia and Canada, for instance, have embedded climate stress testing into portfolio models, while global giants like BlackRock, Amundi, and Allianz now integrate ESG metrics and carbon intensity data into bond selection processes. The logic is straightforward: as climate risks materialize, carbon-heavy assets face rising insurance costs, stranded valuations, and regulatory scrutiny.
Yet, performance isn’t measured only in yields. The growth of impact measurement frameworks like the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) has given investors new ways to quantify social and environmental returns alongside financial ones. This has redefined fiduciary duty itself: a portfolio ignoring climate risk is now a portfolio ignoring value.
As one fund manager put it, “Green finance isn’t a hedge against climate change—it’s a hedge against obsolescence.”
Challenges & Criticisms: Additionality, Greenwashing, and Standards Fragmentation
For all its promise, green finance is grappling with a credibility crisis. As the market balloons past trillions of dollars, questions are mounting over whether the money is truly driving new climate action or merely rebranding existing investments with a green label. This tension centers around three key challenges: additionality, greenwashing, and fragmented standards.
The first hurdle, additionality, asks a simple but crucial question: Would this project have happened without green finance? Many analysts argue that a portion of green bond proceeds merely refinance projects that were already planned, rather than generating new environmental benefits. According to a 2024 study by the OECD, nearly 40% of green-labeled corporate debt globally was issued to roll over previous financing, not to fund additional decarbonization. This dilutes impact and blurs the line between genuine climate financing and routine capital expenditure. Without measurable additionality, the “green” tag risks becoming an accounting trick.
Then comes the issue of greenwashing, where companies exaggerate or misrepresent their sustainability credentials. The Deutsche Bank DWS scandal and the Volkswagen emissions controversy are stark reminders of how easily environmental claims can be manipulated. Even as regulators strengthen disclosure norms, many issuers still cherry-pick metrics or publish vague sustainability reports that lack third-party verification. In the absence of transparency, trust the currency of sustainable finance erodes.
Finally, the global landscape suffers from standards fragmentation. Competing taxonomies from the EU Sustainable Finance Taxonomy to China’s Green Bond Catalogue and the ASEAN Green Bond Standards create confusion and inconsistency. A bond considered green in one jurisdiction might fail to qualify in another. This patchwork not only discourages cross-border investment but also raises the cost of compliance.
Experts warn that without harmonized frameworks and rigorous impact reporting, green finance could repeat the same credibility pitfalls that once plagued the credit ratings industry before 2008. The way forward, they argue, lies in standardization, verification, and an unwavering commitment to measurable results because in sustainable finance, perception without proof is pollution in disguise.
Climate Funds: Structure, Role and Impact Measurement
At the heart of the global green finance ecosystem lies a powerful yet complex engine climate funds. These are specialized investment vehicles designed to mobilize and channel capital toward projects that mitigate or adapt to climate change. Unlike traditional funds driven purely by profit motives, climate funds operate at the intersection of finance and public good, balancing economic returns with measurable environmental and social outcomes.
Structurally, climate funds come in many forms public, private, and blended. Public funds like the Green Climate Fund (GCF) and Global Environment Facility (GEF) pool resources from governments and multilateral institutions to support large-scale adaptation and mitigation projects, particularly in developing nations. Private climate funds, led by giants like BlackRock’s Climate Infrastructure Fund and Generation Investment Management, direct institutional and retail capital into renewable energy, low-carbon transport, and carbon offset markets. Meanwhile, blended finance models, where concessional public capital reduces risks for private investors, are proving transformative. According to the OECD (2024), every dollar of public investment in blended finance mobilizes nearly four dollars of private funding a catalytic multiplier effect critical for achieving the Paris Agreement targets.
However, what sets climate funds apart is their rigorous impact measurement. Performance isn’t just tracked in returns but in avoided emissions, restored ecosystems, and improved livelihoods. Frameworks such as the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), the Impact Reporting Working Group (IRWG), and IFC’s Operating Principles for Impact Management have standardized how climate outcomes are verified and disclosed.
This evolution signifies a deeper truth: climate funds are no longer experimental they are becoming the backbone of global climate finance, ensuring that every invested dollar counts not only toward growth but toward survival on a warming planet.
Earth5R: People-Powered Models & Finance Linkages
The Power of Community Capital: Redefining Local Sustainability Finance
In an age when climate finance often flows through complex institutional channels, Earth5R’s “Community Capital” model offers a refreshingly human-centered alternative. The initiative empowers local citizens to act as both stakeholders and stewards of sustainability projects- funding, implementing, and monitoring initiatives that improve their neighborhoods. Through this model, communities collectively pool time, resources, and skills to create self-sustaining circular economies.
For instance, in Maharashtra, Earth5R mobilized residents to convert waste into usable resources, generating both economic and environmental returns. The process mirrors the concept of microfinance in development economics, but instead of lending money, it channels social capital into ecological projects. By linking local action to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) funding streams, Earth5R’s model demonstrates how grassroots movements can complement formal climate finance. The organization reports measurable outcomes—reduced landfill waste, restored urban biodiversity, and increased livelihoods for informal waste workers—all financed through citizen-driven micro-investment.
Green Finance Awareness: Building Bridges Between Banks and Citizens
Recognizing that financial inclusion is a prerequisite for climate inclusion, Earth5R launched its “Green Finance Awareness Program” in collaboration with major Indian banks like ICICI Bank and the State Bank of India. The campaign reached thousands of students and small business owners, educating them about green bonds, ESG investing, and sustainable entrepreneurship. By demystifying green finance for everyday consumers, Earth5R effectively built a bridge between financial institutions and communities—a missing link in the sustainability ecosystem.
The program also highlighted a critical insight: sustainable finance cannot thrive without public trust and understanding. Just as literacy campaigns in the 20th century democratized education, financial literacy for sustainability could democratize climate investment in the 21st.
Mysore’s Sustainable City Project: Urban Transformation in Action
In Mysore, Earth5R collaborated with municipal authorities and private sponsors to transform waste management systems into circular, revenue-generating models. Funded partly through CSR contributions and supported by Earth5R’s community engagement model, the project turned environmental challenges into economic opportunities—proof that decentralized climate finance can deliver centralized impact.
By aligning local action with global ESG frameworks, Earth5R’s case studies illustrate a powerful principle: the future of green finance is not just institutional—it’s participatory, inclusive, and people-powered.
How Corporates, Banks, and Municipalities Can Scale Credible Issuance
As global demand for sustainable bonds and green finance instruments accelerates, the challenge for corporates, banks, and municipalities is not merely to issue more—but to issue credibly. The future of green finance depends on the quality, transparency, and accountability of the instruments being brought to market. To scale credible issuance, institutions must anchor their strategies in verification, innovation, and inclusivity.
For corporates, credibility begins with science-based targets. Companies like Apple and Toyota have demonstrated how clear emission-reduction roadmaps can align with sustainability-linked bond structures, ensuring that every dollar raised corresponds to measurable climate outcomes. Independent assurance from third parties such as Sustainalytics or CICERO Shades of Green adds a vital layer of trust, transforming climate promises into auditable commitments.
Banks, acting as both issuers and underwriters, play a dual role. Through green lending frameworks and sustainable bond portfolios, they can incentivize clients to transition toward low-carbon operations. Several Indian banks, including YES Bank and HDFC, have successfully launched green bonds tied to renewable energy projects, proving that environmental and financial returns can coexist.
At the municipal level, cities like Pune and Ahmedabad are increasingly exploring municipal green bonds to fund public transit, waste management, and climate-resilient infrastructure. Collaborations with community platforms like Earth5R further enhance transparency and local engagement ensuring the proceeds of every bond reach real projects and real people.
Ultimately, scaling credible issuance means integrating trust into every transaction—because in the world of green finance, legitimacy is the new currency
Policy Recommendations & Best Practices
For the green finance revolution to achieve its full potential, policy must evolve from promotion to precision. Governments, regulators, and financial institutions need to work in concert to create a market where sustainability is not just encouraged but enforced through consistency and credibility. The path forward lies in building trust, transparency, and technical capacity – three pillars of effective green finance governance.
First, regulators must harmonize global taxonomies. The coexistence of overlapping systems from the EU Sustainable Finance Taxonomy to China’s Green Bond Catalogue and regional frameworks like the ASEAN Standards has created confusion for cross-border investors. A unified taxonomy, ideally endorsed through platforms like the International Platform on Sustainable Finance (IPSF), would streamline reporting, lower compliance costs, and make sustainable investments more accessible.
Second, mandatory impact reporting and third-party verification should become industry norms rather than optional practices. Just as financial statements require audits, so should sustainability claims. Countries like France, through its Article 173 regulation, already demand climate-risk disclosures from institutional investors a model that others can emulate.
Lastly, public-private partnerships and capacity-building programs must empower emerging economies to participate in the sustainable finance transition. By supporting tools such as blended finance and local bond markets, policymakers can ensure that green capital flows not only to rich economies but also to those most vulnerable to climate change.
In essence, smart policy must turn ambition into accountability—because without structure, sustainability remains a slogan, not a system.
An Outlook to 2030
As the world moves toward 2030 the benchmark year for the UN Sustainable Development Goals green finance stands at a defining crossroads. The next five years will determine whether sustainable bonds and climate funds remain specialized instruments or evolve into the default architecture of global finance. Analysts from the Climate Bonds Initiative predict that annual green bond issuance could surpass USD 2 trillion by 2030, provided transparency and regulatory alignment continue to strengthen.
However, growth alone will not be enough. The credibility of this expansion will depend on how well markets can integrate community-level accountability, such as Earth5R’s participatory finance models, with institutional scale. The future belongs to systems that measure both profit and planetary health in the same ledger.
By 2030, finance will no longer just price risk it will price responsibility. The institutions that recognize this shift early won’t just lead markets; they’ll define what a sustainable economy truly means.
FAQs on Green Finance Trends: Sustainable Bonds & Climate Funds
What is green finance and why is it important today?
Green finance refers to financial investments that support sustainable environmental outcomes. It’s crucial today because it mobilizes capital toward addressing climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution, aligning economic growth with planetary well-being.
How do green bonds work in simple terms?
Green bonds are like regular bonds, but the funds raised are used exclusively for environmentally beneficial projects such as renewable energy, clean transportation, or climate-resilient infrastructure.
What makes sustainability-linked bonds different from green bonds?
While green bonds fund specific green projects, sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs) tie interest rates to a company’s sustainability performance—rewarding progress or penalizing failure.
What is meant by “climate funds”?
Climate funds are pooled investment vehicles that finance climate mitigation or adaptation projects globally, often combining public and private capital.
Who regulates green finance markets?
Green finance markets are regulated through frameworks like the EU Sustainable Finance Taxonomy, the Green Bond Principles, and national policies developed by central banks and finance ministries.
How large is the green bond market globally?
According to the Climate Bonds Initiative, cumulative green bond issuance surpassed USD 5.7 trillion by the end of 2024, making it one of the fastest-growing financial sectors.
Why are investors increasingly drawn to sustainable investments?
Investors are recognizing that environmental and social risks translate into financial risks. Sustainable investments often deliver competitive returns while ensuring long-term portfolio resilience.
What is the concept of “greenium”?
A “greenium” occurs when investors accept slightly lower yields on green bonds due to their perceived lower risk and positive environmental impact.
How do transition bonds help high-emission industries?
Transition bonds support companies in carbon-intensive sectors as they gradually move toward cleaner operations, financing technologies that lower emissions without requiring an immediate overhaul.
What role does technology play in green finance?
Technologies like AI, blockchain, and ESG analytics enhance transparency by verifying green claims, tracking the use of funds, and assessing environmental impacts in real time.
How does Earth5R connect community initiatives with finance?
Earth5R’s Community Capital model links grassroots sustainability projects with CSR and ESG funding, allowing local communities to become active participants in climate finance.
What are the main risks associated with green finance?
Key risks include greenwashing, lack of standardization, and insufficient impact measurement—all of which can undermine investor trust.
How can companies avoid accusations of greenwashing?
Corporates can enhance credibility by adopting science-based targets, ensuring third-party verification, and publishing transparent impact reports.
Why is additionality an important concept in sustainable finance?
Additionality ensures that green finance creates new climate benefits rather than funding projects that would have happened anyway. It’s the true test of impact.
What is blended finance and why is it important?
Blended finance mixes public and private capital to de-risk investments in developing countries, enabling projects that might otherwise be too risky for private investors.
How can municipalities benefit from issuing green bonds?
Cities can use green bonds to finance clean energy, waste management, and urban transport projects, while attracting investors seeking both impact and stable returns.
What policies can strengthen global green finance markets?
Unified taxonomies, mandatory impact reporting, and public-private partnerships are essential to ensure integrity and scalability in sustainable finance.
What does the outlook for green finance by 2030 look like?
By 2030, annual green bond issuance could exceed USD 2 trillion, with sustainable finance becoming the default global investment standard.
How does green finance support the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)?
Green finance directly contributes to SDGs such as affordable clean energy, sustainable cities, and climate action by channeling funds into measurable sustainability outcomes.
Why is credibility the most valuable currency in green finance?
Because the effectiveness of green finance depends on trust—only verified, transparent, and impactful investments can truly drive the transition toward a sustainable global economy.
Turning Capital into Climate Action
The window for meaningful climate intervention is rapidly closing, and finance remains the most powerful lever we possess. Every bond issued, every fund created, and every policy enacted must now serve a dual purpose profit and preservation. Investors, corporates, and policymakers can no longer afford to operate in silos. The time has come to treat sustainability not as a niche investment class, but as the foundation of economic resilience.
For institutions, this means embedding environmental impact at the heart of every financial decision. For individuals, it means demanding transparency from the funds and companies we support. And for governments, it means aligning fiscal incentives with planetary boundaries.
The next economic revolution won’t be digital it will be green, inclusive, and irreversible. Let’s ensure that by 2030, every dollar moving through global markets helps heal, not harm, the planet. The choice is still ours but not for long.
Authored By- Sneha Reji
