TERRA Score™
India's first ESG intelligence framework built on field-verified ground reality. 1,200+ scored Indian listed companies. 91-column scoring framework. Calibrated against 2.4 billion geo-tagged data points across 150+ Indian cities.
Infosys Limited
Executive Intelligence Brief
Infosys is the cleanest case in India's ITS sector: a TERRA Score of 68.8 just below sector top, CvR at 0.00 with Mode 10 Process-Constrained Honesty, and Accountability at 80.8 the highest in our coverage of 90 IT Services companies. The 16-point trajectory gain over three years is genuine — driven by renewable share moving from 47.9% to 68.9% and the introduction of reasonable assurance on 46 ESG disclosures in FY24 sustained into FY25. The single material concern is rising absolute GHG emissions (+22% YoY) driven by global data centre expansion, which compresses the otherwise-clean trajectory signal. SBTi validation and absolute-emissions reversal are the two catalysts to take the score above 75 and into the Leader band. For ESG-tilted mandates, the directional view is sector top — long-term hold candidate.
- Reasonable assurance on 46 ESG disclosures (sector-leading scope)
- Renewable share at 68.9% — among India's ITS sector leaders
- Zero employee or worker fatalities sustained across 3.48 lakh workforce
- CSR vulnerability segmentation visible across ST/SC/BPL beneficiaries
- GHG emissions increased +22% YoY on growing data centre energy demand
- Net zero pathway announced without SBTi validation
- Water recycling stuck at 18% — well below stated commitment trajectory
- Scope 3 inventory present but not assured at limited tier
Operational footprint at a glance
Underlying disclosed data that anchors the TERRA Score. All values from FY25 BRSR filing.
Five-Dimension Score Architecture
Each dimension contains 4 to 10 sub-indicators scored on a 0 to 100 scale and aggregated using sector-specific weights. Bar colour ramp: green (above 70), teal (55 to 69), amber (40 to 54), coral (25 to 39), red (below 25).
Trajectory
Environmental Reality
Resilience and Systems
Reach and Community
Accountability
Where does this company sit in its sector
Six closest peers by TERRA Score in IT Services, with full dimension breakdown. All 90 IT Services companies in our coverage.
| Company | TERRA | Trajectory | Environmental | Resilience | Reach | Accountability | CvR | Ren % | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Persistent Systems | 70.2 | 66.6 | 79.5 | 71.9 | 56.6 | 77.0 | 0.00 | 57.0% | 0 |
| Infosys ← scored | 68.8 | 58.4 | 78.8 | 68.6 | 59.3 | 80.8 | 0.00 | 68.9% | 1 |
| HCL Technologies | 65.9 | 62.2 | 66.8 | 71.9 | 57.1 | 77.3 | 0.04 | 34.4% | 0 |
| LTIMindtree | 64.2 | 42.7 | 77.1 | 66.6 | 56.0 | 81.5 | 0.00 | 56.8% | 0 |
| TCS | 62.6 | 49.2 | 62.3 | 69.7 | 62.6 | 75.1 | 0.00 | 79.2% | 0 |
| Tech Mahindra | 62.8 | 40.2 | 68.8 | 70.0 | 61.3 | 78.8 | 0.03 | 22.6% | 0 |
CvR Gap — Claim Versus Reality
CvR Gap quantifies the divergence between narrative ESG claims and quantitative data on a 0.00 to 1.00 scale, then classifies the pattern into one of 15 modes.
Anti-Gaming Audit · 13 Checks
Each TERRA scorecard runs 13 anti-gaming checks designed to detect common ESG disclosure manipulation patterns. Triggered checks materially adjust dimension scores and CvR Gap classification.
3-Year Trajectory Analysis
FY23 to FY25 progression at score and dimension level. Direction is classified as Improving (above +2 over 3 years), Declining (below -2), or Mixed.
Top 5 Forward-Looking Risks
Risks ranked by materiality and time horizon. Each risk maps to specific scorecard sub-indicators.
| # | Risk description | Time horizon | Materiality | Affects |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SBTi validation absence becomes ESG fund screening exclusion | 12 to 18 months | Medium | T4, A1 |
| 2 | GHG emissions trending upward (+22% YoY) on growing energy demand | 24 months | Medium | T1, E1 |
| 3 | Scope 3 supply chain disclosure depth thin against IT peers | 12 to 24 months | Medium | E1, R1.1 |
| 4 | Water recycling rate stuck below 20% across data centre footprint | 24 to 36 months | Low | E9, R1.2 |
| 5 | Climate risk asset-level mapping incomplete for global delivery centres | 36 months | Low | R1.2 |
Top 5 Uplift Actions
Actions ranked by score impact and implementation cost. Cumulative impact reflects what is achievable over a 12 to 18 month horizon if all five actions are delivered.
| # | Uplift action | Score impact | Time to deliver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Validate net zero pathway with SBTi and publish near-term science-based targets | +6 to +10 on T4 +1.2 to +2.0 on TERRA |
9 to 12 months |
| 2 | Reverse YoY GHG trajectory through accelerated renewable PPA scale-up | +8 to +12 on T1, E7 +1.5 to +2.5 on TERRA |
12 to 18 months |
| 3 | Deepen Scope 3 supplier engagement with Tier-2 ESG cascade and assurance | +10 to +15 on R1.1 +1.0 to +1.5 on TERRA |
12 to 18 months |
| 4 | Publish facility-level water recycling roadmap with WRI Aqueduct overlay | +5 to +8 on E9, E2 +0.6 to +1.0 on TERRA |
6 to 12 months |
| 5 | Expand reasonable assurance scope to Scope 3 emissions and biodiversity disclosures | +4 to +6 on A1, A4 +0.4 to +0.7 on TERRA |
6 to 9 months |
What the scorecard implies for valuation
How the disclosed data should map into ESG-screened pricing decisions. Each rationale anchors to specific scorecard sub-indicators.
Top 5 material issues — financial, ESG, management readiness
| Material issue | Financial impact | ESG impact | Mgmt readiness |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBTi validation absence | High | High | Low |
| Absolute GHG growth | Medium | High | Medium |
| Scope 3 supplier depth | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| Water recycling rate | Low | Medium | High |
| Climate adaptation mapping | Low | Low | Medium |
VA Tech Wabag Limited
Executive Intelligence Brief
VA Tech Wabag is India's listed pure-play water utility leader, but the FY25 scorecard registers a material regression. TERRA dropped 6.5 points over three years (58.8 to 52.3), the trajectory dimension collapsed from 48.8 to 32.3, and the renewable share fell from 72.5% (FY24) to 8.9% (FY25) — the latter likely a restatement that has not been independently reconciled. Two worker fatalities against zero employee fatalities triggered the Safety Parity flag for the first time. The CvR remains aligned at 0.05 (Mode 11 Transition-in-Progress), reflecting honest disclosure of weak operational data rather than narrative inflation. For a sector leader in water management, the absence of third-party ESG assurance and the unverified community impact claims are the binding governance gaps. Engagement priority is reasonable assurance plus safety parity disclosure within 12 months. Until the trajectory stabilises, the directional view is underweight.
- Full GHG disclosure with Scope 3 (21.9 lakh tCO2e) and physical intensity normalisation
- Waste diversion at 100% — best-in-sector circularity discipline
- Hazardous waste management at 90 (sub-indicator) with zero landfill
- Process-Constrained Honesty mode confirms underclaiming pattern across narrative
- Two worker fatalities with zero employee fatalities — safety parity gap
- Renewable share collapsed from 72.5% to 8.9% YoY without reconciliation
- No third-party ESG assurance despite top-150 listed company status
- Community-verified impact at sub-indicator score 8 — water programs uncorroborated
Operational footprint at a glance
Underlying disclosed data that anchors the TERRA Score. All values from FY25 BRSR filing.
Five-Dimension Score Architecture
Each dimension contains 4 to 10 sub-indicators scored on a 0 to 100 scale and aggregated using sector-specific weights. Bar colour ramp: green (above 70), teal (55 to 69), amber (40 to 54), coral (25 to 39), red (below 25).
Trajectory
Environmental Reality
Resilience and Systems
Reach and Community
Accountability
Where does this company sit in its sector
Six closest peers by TERRA Score in Water Management & Utilities, with full dimension breakdown. 2 listed pure-play; broader water/utility cohort below.
| Company | TERRA | Trajectory | Environmental | Resilience | Reach | Accountability | CvR | Ren % | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA Tech Wabag ← scored | 52.3 | 32.3 | 61.1 | 57.1 | 48.3 | 64.9 | 0.05 | 8.9% | 2 |
| D. P. Abhushan (sector #2) | 36.9 | 23.1 | 41.2 | 45.5 | 39.0 | 33.1 | 0.51 | 0.0% | 0 |
| NTPC (broader power utility) | 51.4 | 42.0 | 50.5 | 56.0 | 51.5 | 57.0 | 0.05 | 4.5% | 3 |
| Power Grid (transmission) | 53.2 | 41.0 | 54.5 | 60.0 | 52.0 | 58.5 | 0.04 | 2.0% | 0 |
| Tata Power (integrated) | 48.3 | 36.0 | 47.0 | 52.0 | 49.0 | 57.5 | 0.00 | 25.5% | 1 |
| JSW Energy (renewable) | 56.0 | 53.0 | 54.0 | 60.5 | 51.0 | 61.5 | 0.04 | 71.0% | 0 |
CvR Gap — Claim Versus Reality
CvR Gap quantifies the divergence between narrative ESG claims and quantitative data on a 0.00 to 1.00 scale, then classifies the pattern into one of 15 modes.
Anti-Gaming Audit · 13 Checks
Each TERRA scorecard runs 13 anti-gaming checks designed to detect common ESG disclosure manipulation patterns. Triggered checks materially adjust dimension scores and CvR Gap classification.
3-Year Trajectory Analysis
FY23 to FY25 progression at score and dimension level. Direction is classified as Improving (above +2 over 3 years), Declining (below -2), or Mixed.
Top 5 Forward-Looking Risks
Risks ranked by materiality and time horizon. Each risk maps to specific scorecard sub-indicators.
| # | Risk description | Time horizon | Materiality | Affects |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Two worker fatalities triggering Safety Parity flag without root-cause publication | 12 months | High | R2.8, R2.5 |
| 2 | Trajectory regressing 6.5 points over 3 years — momentum negative | 12 to 18 months | High | T1, T3 |
| 3 | No third-party ESG assurance — disclosure depth unverified | 18 to 24 months | High | A1, A2 |
| 4 | Renewable share dropped from 72.5% (FY24) to 8.9% (FY25) — restatement concern | 12 months | High | E7, T3 |
| 5 | Community-verified impact at 8 — claimed water access programs unverified | 24 months | Medium | R2.2, A5 |
Top 5 Uplift Actions
Actions ranked by score impact and implementation cost. Cumulative impact reflects what is achievable over a 12 to 18 month horizon if all five actions are delivered.
| # | Uplift action | Score impact | Time to deliver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Implement third-party reasonable assurance on FY26 BRSR Core disclosures | +15 to +20 on A1, A2 +1.8 to +2.5 on TERRA |
9 to 12 months |
| 2 | Publish contractor HSE root-cause analysis and unify safety KPIs across workforce | +10 to +15 on R2.5, R2.8 +1.0 to +1.5 on TERRA |
6 to 9 months |
| 3 | Restate FY24 to FY25 renewable share trajectory with auditor sign-off | +8 to +12 on T3, E7 +1.2 to +2.0 on TERRA |
6 months |
| 4 | Validate 2050 net zero target with SBTi and publish near-term milestones | +6 to +10 on T4 +0.7 to +1.2 on TERRA |
12 to 18 months |
| 5 | Independent audit of Reliance Foundation-equivalent CVI claims and beneficiary segmentation | +10 to +18 on R2.1, R2.2 +1.0 to +1.8 on TERRA |
9 to 12 months |
What the scorecard implies for valuation
How the disclosed data should map into ESG-screened pricing decisions. Each rationale anchors to specific scorecard sub-indicators.
Top 5 material issues — financial, ESG, management readiness
| Material issue | Financial impact | ESG impact | Mgmt readiness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disclosure regression | High | High | Low |
| Safety parity gap | Medium | High | Low |
| Third-party assurance absent | High | Medium | Medium |
| Renewable restatement | Medium | High | Low |
| CVI score at 8 — claims unverified | Low | Medium | Medium |
Jindal Steel & Power Limited
Executive Intelligence Brief
Jindal Steel & Power scores TERRA 54.5, mid-band Average and rank #5 of 35 in the Indian listed steel cohort. The dominant scorecard signal is a CvR of 0.36 sitting in the Significant band with Mode 2 Curated Omission classification — meaning the disclosed narrative selectively omits material categories rather than overclaiming. Scope 3 emissions are not disclosed for a steel operator (the most material gap possible in this sector), and nine total fatalities (1 employee + 8 worker) in FY25 trigger the highest social-pillar concern across our O2C/Steel coverage. Three anti-gaming flags are active: Blanket Vulnerability (CSR segmentation absent), Scope 3 Materiality, and Offset Blending. The trajectory has declined 3.8 points over three years and Accountability dropped from 62.2 (FY24) to 49.0 (FY25). For ESG-screened mandates, this is a caution case requiring active monitoring on Scope 3 disclosure and HSE root-cause publication before any directional re-rating.
- Waste diversion rate at 72% — within sector norm
- Air pollution monitoring at 87 sub-indicator score
- Energy intensity score at 95 reflects efficient per-tonne energy use
- Stakeholder engagement framework documented at 71
- Scope 3 omitted entirely for an integrated steel operator
- Nine total fatalities (1 employee + 8 worker) without unified HSE root-cause publication
- Renewable share at 0% with no transition capex pathway disclosed
- No third-party ESG assurance despite material operational footprint
Operational footprint at a glance
Underlying disclosed data that anchors the TERRA Score. All values from FY25 BRSR filing.
Five-Dimension Score Architecture
Each dimension contains 4 to 10 sub-indicators scored on a 0 to 100 scale and aggregated using sector-specific weights. Bar colour ramp: green (above 70), teal (55 to 69), amber (40 to 54), coral (25 to 39), red (below 25).
Trajectory
Environmental Reality
Resilience and Systems
Reach and Community
Accountability
Where does this company sit in its sector
Six closest peers by TERRA Score in Steel, with full dimension breakdown. All 35 Steel companies in our coverage.
| Company | TERRA | Trajectory | Environmental | Resilience | Reach | Accountability | CvR | Ren % | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata Steel | 59.8 | 49.0 | 62.5 | 60.9 | 57.8 | 73.8 | 0.00 | 0.1% | 5 |
| APL Apollo Tubes | 56.7 | 48.7 | 63.9 | 54.1 | 51.2 | 67.5 | 0.00 | 20.0% | 0 |
| Jindal Stainless | 56.0 | 54.1 | 49.5 | 60.8 | 54.1 | 70.8 | 0.18 | 4.1% | 0 |
| HARIOM PIPE | 55.7 | 38.8 | 72.9 | 49.7 | 51.4 | 60.8 | 0.00 | 3.5% | 0 |
| Jindal Steel & Power ← scored | 54.5 | 36.4 | 75.0 | 54.3 | 48.0 | 49.0 | 0.36 | 0.0% | 9 |
| JSW Steel | 49.9 | 41.9 | 42.1 | 54.3 | 48.3 | 77.9 | 0.00 | 0.6% | 5 |
CvR Gap — Claim Versus Reality
CvR Gap quantifies the divergence between narrative ESG claims and quantitative data on a 0.00 to 1.00 scale, then classifies the pattern into one of 15 modes.
Anti-Gaming Audit · 13 Checks
Each TERRA scorecard runs 13 anti-gaming checks designed to detect common ESG disclosure manipulation patterns. Triggered checks materially adjust dimension scores and CvR Gap classification.
3-Year Trajectory Analysis
FY23 to FY25 progression at score and dimension level. Direction is classified as Improving (above +2 over 3 years), Declining (below -2), or Mixed.
Top 5 Forward-Looking Risks
Risks ranked by materiality and time horizon. Each risk maps to specific scorecard sub-indicators.
| # | Risk description | Time horizon | Materiality | Affects |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nine total fatalities (1 employee + 8 worker) — sector-high HSE incident burden | Immediate | High | R2.8, R2.5 |
| 2 | Material Scope 3 omitted for steel sector — primary CvR driver | 12 to 18 months | High | E1, A1 |
| 3 | Curated Omission CvR mode at 0.36 — narrative substance materially exceeds data | 12 months | High | A1, A4 |
| 4 | Renewable share at 0% with no published transition pathway | 24 to 36 months | High | E7, T4 |
| 5 | GHG emissions increasing +18% YoY on growing energy intensity | 12 to 24 months | High | E1, T1 |
Top 5 Uplift Actions
Actions ranked by score impact and implementation cost. Cumulative impact reflects what is achievable over a 12 to 18 month horizon if all five actions are delivered.
| # | Uplift action | Score impact | Time to deliver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Establish Scope 3 emissions baseline with independent verification | +15 to +25 on E1, A1 +2.0 to +3.5 on TERRA |
12 to 18 months |
| 2 | Publish HSE root-cause analysis for 9 fatalities and remediation roadmap | +10 to +18 on R2.8, R2.5 +1.5 to +2.5 on TERRA |
6 to 9 months |
| 3 | Implement third-party ESG assurance and validate net zero with SBTi | +12 to +20 on A1, T4 +1.8 to +3.0 on TERRA |
12 to 18 months |
| 4 | Initiate renewable PPA and on-site solar to reach 10% renewable share by FY27 | +10 to +15 on E7 +1.5 to +2.2 on TERRA |
24 months |
| 5 | Disclose CSR beneficiary segmentation with field-verified ST/SC/BPL share | +8 to +12 on R2.1, R2.2 +0.8 to +1.5 on TERRA |
6 to 9 months |
What the scorecard implies for valuation
How the disclosed data should map into ESG-screened pricing decisions. Each rationale anchors to specific scorecard sub-indicators.
Top 5 material issues — financial, ESG, management readiness
| Material issue | Financial impact | ESG impact | Mgmt readiness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 3 omission | High | High | Low |
| Fatality count + HSE non-disclosure | High | High | Low |
| Renewable share at 0% | Medium | High | Low |
| Gender equity at 4.5% | Low | Medium | Medium |
| Third-party assurance absent | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Bharti Airtel Limited
Executive Intelligence Brief
Bharti Airtel is the TEL sector top in our coverage at TERRA 59.4 (sector range 30.3 to 59.4 across 17 companies). The trajectory is genuinely improving — up 11.7 points over three years driven by reasonable assurance scope expansion and disclosure quality at 83. But CvR sits at 0.29 in the Moderate band, classified as Mode 12 Transition Ambiguity — meaning the announced 2050 net zero pathway and SBTi commitment are running materially ahead of operational delivery. Renewable share is 0.8%, four anti-gaming flags are active (Absolute vs Percentage, Blanket Vulnerability, Contract Worker Ratio at 84%, Offset Blending), and Scope 3 is not disclosed. Five fatalities (1 employee + 4 worker) confirm the contract workforce safety gap. The mixed signal is real: this is sector top on disclosure infrastructure but mid-band on operational substance. For ESG-tilted mandates, hold with engagement priorities on Scope 3 disclosure, SBTi validation, and contract workforce structure within an 18 to 24 month window.
- Reasonable assurance on 14 ESG disclosures (sector-leading scope)
- Trajectory improvement: TERRA up 11.7 points over 3 years
- Disclosure quality at 83 — sector-leading documentation depth
- Water recycling at 63% across tower operations
- Heavy contract workforce at 84% of total — anti-gaming flag triggered
- Renewable share at 0.8% against announced 2050 net zero pathway
- Scope 3 not disclosed for a telecom operator with material tower energy footprint
- SBTi committed but not validated — pledge-progress gap at sub-indicator score 41
Operational footprint at a glance
Underlying disclosed data that anchors the TERRA Score. All values from FY25 BRSR filing.
Five-Dimension Score Architecture
Each dimension contains 4 to 10 sub-indicators scored on a 0 to 100 scale and aggregated using sector-specific weights. Bar colour ramp: green (above 70), teal (55 to 69), amber (40 to 54), coral (25 to 39), red (below 25).
Trajectory
Environmental Reality
Resilience and Systems
Reach and Community
Accountability
Where does this company sit in its sector
Six closest peers by TERRA Score in Telecom & Communication, with full dimension breakdown. All 17 Telecom & Communication companies in our coverage.
| Company | TERRA | Trajectory | Environmental | Resilience | Reach | Accountability | CvR | Ren % | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bharti Airtel ← scored | 59.4 | 52.1 | 61.1 | 68.5 | 54.0 | 63.6 | 0.29 | 0.8% | 5 |
| Tata Communications | 57.4 | 52.1 | 59.8 | 63.2 | 47.7 | 69.4 | 0.06 | 33.9% | 0 |
| Indus Towers | 53.0 | 49.5 | 42.4 | 63.0 | 53.2 | 68.0 | 0.12 | 1.0% | 2 |
| Vodafone Idea | 50.7 | 33.4 | 53.3 | 61.8 | 46.6 | 64.6 | 0.12 | 8.7% | 0 |
| GTL Infrastructure | 49.0 | 40.0 | 46.0 | 58.0 | 47.0 | 55.0 | 0.00 | 1.5% | 0 |
| TTML | 47.8 | 36.5 | 49.3 | 51.4 | 45.6 | 61.4 | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0 |
CvR Gap — Claim Versus Reality
CvR Gap quantifies the divergence between narrative ESG claims and quantitative data on a 0.00 to 1.00 scale, then classifies the pattern into one of 15 modes.
Anti-Gaming Audit · 13 Checks
Each TERRA scorecard runs 13 anti-gaming checks designed to detect common ESG disclosure manipulation patterns. Triggered checks materially adjust dimension scores and CvR Gap classification.
3-Year Trajectory Analysis
FY23 to FY25 progression at score and dimension level. Direction is classified as Improving (above +2 over 3 years), Declining (below -2), or Mixed.
Top 5 Forward-Looking Risks
Risks ranked by materiality and time horizon. Each risk maps to specific scorecard sub-indicators.
| # | Risk description | Time horizon | Materiality | Affects |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Contract worker ratio at 84% triggering anti-gaming flag — workforce composition risk | 12 months | High | R2.5, R2.8 |
| 2 | Scope 3 omitted for telecom operator — disclosure gap | 12 to 18 months | High | E1, A1 |
| 3 | Five fatalities (1 employee + 4 worker) without root-cause publication | 12 months | High | R2.8, R2.5 |
| 4 | Renewable share at 0.8% against 2050 net zero pledge — Transition Ambiguity | 24 to 36 months | High | E7, T4 |
| 5 | SBTi committed but not validated — credibility gap on stated trajectory | 12 to 18 months | Medium | T4, A1 |
Top 5 Uplift Actions
Actions ranked by score impact and implementation cost. Cumulative impact reflects what is achievable over a 12 to 18 month horizon if all five actions are delivered.
| # | Uplift action | Score impact | Time to deliver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Publish Scope 3 inventory for tower energy and supply chain with assurance | +15 to +20 on E1, A1 +2.0 to +3.0 on TERRA |
12 to 18 months |
| 2 | Convert SBTi commitment to validated near-term science-based targets | +10 to +15 on T4, A1 +1.5 to +2.2 on TERRA |
12 to 18 months |
| 3 | Publish unified HSE root-cause analysis and reduce contract worker ratio below 60% | +10 to +18 on R2.5, R2.8 +1.5 to +2.5 on TERRA |
18 to 24 months |
| 4 | Accelerate renewable PPAs to reach 5% renewable share by FY27 | +12 to +18 on E7, T1 +1.8 to +2.8 on TERRA |
24 months |
| 5 | Increase CSR spend to 2% of profit threshold and disclose vulnerability segmentation | +8 to +12 on R2.1, R2.4 +0.6 to +1.0 on TERRA |
6 to 12 months |
What the scorecard implies for valuation
How the disclosed data should map into ESG-screened pricing decisions. Each rationale anchors to specific scorecard sub-indicators.
Top 5 material issues — financial, ESG, management readiness
| Material issue | Financial impact | ESG impact | Mgmt readiness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 3 disclosure absence | High | High | Medium |
| Renewable share 0.8% vs 2050 NZ pledge | High | High | Medium |
| Contract workforce 84% | Medium | High | Low |
| SBTi committed-not-validated | Medium | Medium | High |
| Worker fatality root-cause gap | Low | Medium | Medium |